Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Layoffs Begin

June 23, 2009

 

Photograph by Harvard Magazine

Union members from AFSCME protest potential layoffs at Harvard on Commencement day.

The University announced this morning that it would begin laying off 275 employees and reducing the hours of 40 other employees or limiting them to an academic-year work schedule. Although the total number of layoffs and reductions is relatively modest compared to Harvard’s total workforce—there were approximately 12,950 full-time-equivalent non-faculty staff members as of last October—the symbolic import of a large, stable employer like Harvard resorting to such actions surely looms larger.

In a note e-mail to the community, President Drew Faust cited other actions to cut costs—a salary freeze for faculty members and non-union staff, a voluntary early-retirement program (531 staff members took the incentive program; see further details at “Early-Retirement Program and Other Cost-Cutting Measures”)—but said, “[W]e nevertheless have more we must do.” Noting the relatively modest scale of the workforce reduction, she called the action “nonetheless painful for the people directly affected, as well as for our community as a whole.”

A more detailed letter from Marilyn Hausammann, vice president for human resources, said that about half the positions eliminated are administrative or professional jobs, and most of the rest involve technical or clerical work. Service and trade employees are largely unaffected, she wrote.

The layoffs will be announced in most of the  professional schools first; they will be followed by reductions in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS), Harvard Medical School, the central administration, and several allied institutions next week. Affected employees are being offered 60 days of pay from the time of notification; lump-sum severance payments of one to two weeks per year of service; an additional four weeks of pay; and the opportunity to purchase health benefits for 18 months (including the first year at subsidized rates).

The layoffs and reduced hours affect about 2.4 percent of Harvard’s non-faculty workforce; the earlier retirement program reduced the staff employee count by 4.1 percent. The faculty ranks have not been affected by either action. (The faculty census numbered 2,325 full-time equivalents in the fall of 2007, the last published figure, including lecturers, visiting professors, and others; faculty appointees in the affiliated hospitals are not included in that total.)

When combined with other moves to cut expenses, such as the salary freeze, limits on hiring, slowing the pace of Allston construction and other capital projects, and so on—all driven primarily by the projected 30 percent decline in the value of endowment assets—these staff-workforce reductions will make an impact on the looming budget pressures in several of the schools and allied institutions. But they do not nearly close the biggest gaps, such as the $220-million deficit looming over FAS. As reported, FAS had identified just $77 million of the expense savings it anticipates needing to make; presumably whatever staff reductions are being announced now within FAS were counted as part of that initial $77 million of cuts, leaving $143 million in costs still to be removed from the core academic budget.

For coverage of community concern about the prospect of layoffs, and student opposition to workforce reductions, see “Looming Layoffs.” For complete coverage of the University’s financial straits, see the “University Financial Crisis” site at the Harvard Magazine homepage.

Here are the full texts of the statements by Faust and Hausammann:

Dear Colleagues,

As all of you know, this past year has created a set of extraordinary financial challenges for our university as it has for others. I am grateful for the continuing efforts made by people across Harvard to confront these new realities with thoughtfulness and care, and with an emphasis on sustaining the strength of our core academic programs.

With compensation accounting for so high a proportion of our budget, we will enter the 2009-10 academic year with salaries held flat for faculty and exempt staff; we have also offered a voluntary early retirement program in which more than 500 staff members across Harvard have chosen to participate.

While these actions have helped us reduce expenses, we nevertheless have more we must do. In the coming days, Harvard’s Schools and units, as well as its central administration, will be carrying out a reduction in the size of our workforce - modest in comparison to the overall size of our University-wide staff, but nonetheless painful for those people directly affected, as well as for our community as a whole. Most of the Schools will carry out the process this week; the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, the Medical School, the central administration, and several of the allied institutions will follow, beginning on June 29.

Such decisions, in their human dimensions, are among the hardest that an institution like ours can make. But difficult circumstances have called for difficult decisions across the University.

As we proceed through this complicated transition, I want again to express my appreciation to all of you for your dedicated efforts on Harvard’s behalf. A letter from Marilyn Hausammann, our vice president for human resources, explaining more about the planned reductions, appears below.

Sincerely,

Drew Faust

 

Dear Colleagues,

I am writing to let you know that most of the Schools, allied institutions, and units in the central administration at Harvard will be carrying out a reduction in our workforce over the next seven business days.

The size and scope of the reductions will vary across the Schools and units, but when taken together these changes will result in the elimination of approximately 275 staff positions. About 40 more staff members will be offered positions with reduced work hours or an academic year schedule. Deans at the affected Schools and department leaders will be communicating directly with their staff members about the changes taking place in their local communities over the coming days.
 
We regret the impact this will have on the lives of our valued colleagues. This decision was driven by the financial challenges facing the University after a projected 30 percent drop in our endowment, as well as pressure on other revenue sources, and it should not be allowed to diminish the many contributions made by these staff members during their time with the University.
 
Over the past six months, managers across the University have scrubbed their budgets for non-personnel savings, canceled or curtailed travel, and limited other discretionary spending. We have slowed development in Allston, strictly limited hiring, and reduced our reliance on outside contractors. We have held salaries flat for the coming year for our faculty and exempt staff, a move affecting more than 9,000 individuals. And the Voluntary Early Retirement Program that was offered to about 1,600 employees attracted more than 500 participants.

These steps have helped to keep the number of involuntary reductions as small as possible. Unfortunately, further cuts are needed in order for Harvard to adjust to the institution’s new economic reality.

About half of the positions eliminated are administrative or professional positions, and almost all of the remaining ones are clerical or technical jobs. Service and trade workers will be largely unaffected.

The University is taking a number of steps to support staff members facing layoffs. These include:

  • 60 days of pay from the time of notification,
  • lump-sum severance of one to two weeks of pay for each year of service,
  • enhanced severance benefits that include an additional four weeks of pay, and
  • the opportunity to continue medical and dental benefits for 18 months, with a full year at subsidized rates.


Employees will have access to information about their benefits in individually prepared materials, on HARVie, and at a special walk-in Employee Support Center.
 
Administrative/professional and non-union employees wishing to begin a new job search are eligible for outplacement services and employment coaching. Harvard case management will be provided for HUCTW members. And, effective immediately, Harvard will institute a 30-day external hiring freeze for staff jobs to focus our efforts on matching qualified internal candidates with current job openings. I know that this is difficult news both for our colleagues whose positions are being eliminated and for those of you who will miss working alongside them. I think it is important to note that all of the steps that we have taken to reduce spending over the past six months have been taken with the aim of sustaining the academic and organizational capabilities Harvard will need for the future, while minimizing the impact on our workforce.
 
To those of you who are directly affected by this reduction in force, please know that we will do everything we can to make your transition as smooth as possible.
 
And to the entire University community, please know that we appreciate your dedication in this challenging time. With your help, Harvard will continue to be a vital and engaging place to work.


Sincerely,


Marilyn Hausammann
Vice President for Human Resources

 

 

26 Comments

Comments 1-10 (page )

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture
George Patsourakos wrote:

It is unfortunate that Harvard is laying off 275 employees, because of America’s economic slump. Fortunately, the layoffs affect only about 2 percent of Harvard’s non-faculty workforce, with no layoffs of faculty members. Because it employs about 13,000 full-time non-faculty staff members, Harvard plans to lay off additional employees in the near future. Hopefully, America’s economy will improve, so that a minimal number of employees will be affected by this plan.

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Felipe Farley wrote:

Dear Sirs:
Perhaps everyone would agree to at least a twenty percent (20%) cut in salary, including top administrators, who might be asked to take a thirty percent cut (Or perhaps there should be a sliding scale: the higher the salary, the larger the cut). I hope no one would then have to be dismissed into this dire economy.
Sincerely,
Felipe Farley (class of 1986)

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Eric Blackman wrote:

I would like to know the extent to which the Harvard financial managers in charge of the endowment are being held responsible for the loss of endowment. From my observations, most all private universities are saying very little about the role of their own financial decisions in their investment failures. Yet, the high salaries paid to these managers should come with a high level of responsibility. I myself lost a much lower percentage than Harvard by making a few key decisions within the past 2 years on my mutual fund investments after spending only a small amount of time reading about aspects of the current financial state of the country. But I am a physics professor with a full time job. Is it not the job of the financial managers to spend full time to make even better decisions? It is not acceptable for Harvard to portray itself as a passive victim of the market if it is paying 8 figure salaries to its fund managers. When their decisions go wrong, we should hear about the consequences for the financial management instead of hearing that janitors will be fired.

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Ethan S. Burger, '81 wrote:

Greetings:

It is a shame that the “Best and the Brightest” portfolio managers did not take simple precautions like selling automatically securities within Harvard’s Endowment when their value declined beyond a certain percentage.

James Fallows in Atlantic Monthly roughly 2 years ago, predicted the collapse of the U.S. real estate market. Similarly, Professor Nouriel Roubini predictions of a global financial crisis were largely ignored. Niall Ferguson of Harvard’s History Department is spot on when he has criticized many economists for failing to predict the greatest economic decline since the great depression.

In any event, one wonders to what degree did Harvard explore the possibility of employees accepting interim wage decreases in some equitable manner to preserve as many jobs as possible.

Often employers are not well acquainted with both federal and state laws dealing with age discrimination. While I would think that both Harvard’s Office of General Counsel and the labor unions are well advised in this area, I am often surprised that this is not always the case.

Some individuals may find the following PowerPoint presentation of interest:

http://www.slideshare.net/ethansb/is-your-employers-reorganization-a-lat…

Regards.

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Paul A. Callahan wrote:

I think the layoffs are disgraceful.
Alternatives:
1] Reduce the ridiculous salaries/bonuses at Harvard Management. These are thr “pros” who gbot the collegwe in thisa mess. [I note some are fleeing already}
2] The faculty should also feel some pain.Why are they exempt.

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
C wrote:

It’s happening over there, too…
~ C

June 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Pulacode V.Veeraraghavan wrote:

Impact of US Recession on educational institutions.

June 24, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Ogden Ross wrote:

The implication is that the economy shrank thirty to forty percent. The troubling being that represent excess capacity which has to de-leveraged. Unfortunately, everyone bit into the myth to the same degree except for the perpetrators. As Harvard was supposed to be so smart about managing the endowment I think their advisors were stupid. Clearly, breaks in the top occurred in 2007 but by 2008 in August the correction was in free fall. My beef is that Harvard had become sold out to the prevailing mentality of greed which jeopardized the gains. Where were the profits? We should be cash positive withy no losses at all. If your people were smart Harvard would be cash positive. To augment the endowment positions should have been shorted all the way into March 10th. Goldman Sachs did, why didn’t you? I thought your advisors knew what the deal was about. I guess not. Now you expect the Alumni to pick you back up? There is going to be a problem with this, ie 10 billion dollars from where, the sky? Personally, I am pissed off the way the way the whole thing went down.

June 24, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Edward Story wrote:

Let me see if I understand this. 275 employees are losing their jobs in the middle of what looks like a repeat of the ’30s Great Depression because the school’s investments lost 30% of its value?

Forgive me for my naivete, but at what point did Harvard start depending on the investments to operate? isn’t that eating the seed corn?

Am I confusing the Endowment with the Retirement Fund?

Harvard continues to ask for money when it’s had an almost obscene amount of investments (Endowment, Retirement, et al).

And because it is still 2/3rds as large you need to put 275 people out in the street?

I would think we/you/whoever could do better than that.

Ed

June 24, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Ted Myers wrote:

I don’t know the salaries of the employees in question, or the current value of the endowment, but here’s an informed guess:
275 employees x $60k/yr =$16.5M/yr.
$35B - ($35B x 0.30) = $24.5B
$16.5M / $24.5B = 0.00067

The amount recovered by layoffs is only 0.07% of the endowment, a drop in the bucket. As the sign in the photo says, “HARVARD HAS THE MONEY!” Why must the employees feel the pain? Just accept the investment loss and get on with the 100-year plan.

June 24, 2009

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.
  • You may use [discuss] or [extra] tags to display icon and optionally linked callout such as "Extra or Join the Conversation".

Copyright ©1996—2010
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster