Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • It Runs in the Family: Three Jasanoff Professors at Harvard - All four members of the Jasanoff family—Jay, Sheila, M... http://ow.ly/18mucp 1 day 11 hours ago
  • New Study Finds Long-Lasting Influence of Early Education - Kindergarten teachers and class sizes can affect adult o... http://ow.ly/18mucr 1 day 11 hours ago
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Radio Wits

Joking about the news, at the speed of sound

by Craig Lambert

 

Copyright © 2004 NPR Photo/Photograph by Tony Nagelmann

Carl Kassel (left), announcer for National Public Radio’s weekly Wait, Wait…Don’t Tell Me! clowns with its host, Peter Sagal.

Extra
Hear an excerpt from Craig Lambert’s interview with Peter Sagal ’87.

You’re at a dinner party with exceptionally witty guests, well versed on current events. Lots of laughs: the wisecracking atmosphere’s slightly competitive, though it hums with conviviality.  After a bit, someone famous drops by for some banter and good-natured ribbing. That’s how the weekly radio show Wait, Wait…Don’t Tell Me! on National Public Radio (NPR) feels: it’s a comical quiz show based on current news stories, both mainstream headlines and oddball dispatches like…well, like news that roughly 500 Britons are hospitalized annually from injuries caused by eating cookies—poking oneself in the eye with a biscuit, scalding oneself while dipping the treat in tea, being nipped by a sweet-toothed pet. Host Peter Sagal ’87 presides and joins in the repartee; two of the 11 rotating panelists (three appear on each week’s broadcast)—Roy Blount Jr., A.M. ’64, and Mo Rocca ’91—also bring a Harvard background to the radio salon.

NPR

NPR

Asked how he triggers the show’s rapid-fire exchanges, Sagal shrugs, grins, and says, “We’re just fast.” Indeed, Wait, Wait…  is no place for l’esprit de l’escalier, those clever ripostes one thinks of when it is too late to deliver them.  Panelists need to be witty on the spot, though much of the mirth is contextual. “It’s more anecdotal than quippal,” says Blount, characteristically neologizing. “You have to focus, and be more pushy in conversation than I’m used to. The audience helps keep you keyed up.”

An October show got off on a jag about a new line of “sexy” Halloween costumes for pets, prompting Sagal to declare, “I don’t find cats or dogs particularly sexy, because they belong to another species.” Rocca fired back, “I’m old-fashioned. I find cats sexier when they wear more clothing, and leave more to the imagination.”

The program launched in 1998, with Sagal and Blount on the first show; Sagal was quickly promoted to host, even though, as he says, “I’m not a radio guy.” In fact, he came from a theater background—in college, he coauthored a Hasty Pudding show and directed a Loeb mainstage production, then spent several years as a playwright, screenwriter, director, theatrical literary manager, actor, and staff writer for a motorcycle magazine. 

Until 2005, almost all the Wait, Wait… shows were produced from an NPR studio in its home base of Chicago, with panelists patched in from remote locations (Rocca from New York City, for example, and Blount from western Massachusetts).

A turning point arrived that April, when Wait, Wait… began recording every show before a live audience—they had done quite a few live shows since 2000—and became more of an “event.” (Now it is also on the road 12 weeks per year.) Suddenly there was on-air laughter from an audience of hundreds or even thousands, and the radio listenership climbed, from 1.5 million in 2005 to nearly twice that today. In the studio years, “I didn’t know whom I was speaking to,” Sagal says. “I like audiences—performing for people and watching their reaction.”

Yet the live audience of, say, 2,800 for a road show in Boston mustn’t so seduce Sagal that he forgets the radio audience of three million who will hear Wait, Wait… on the weekend after it has been recorded on a Thursday night and edited the next day. “The trick is: the show is not for the audience in front of you,” he explains. “They are part of the show that you’re doing for everybody listening on the radio. Garrison Keillor is really good at that: he comes out before Prairie Home Companion starts and enlists them in the enterprise.”

At its best, the Wait, Wait… enterprise is very improvisational. “It’s the most relaxing job I’ve ever had,” Rocca says. “You can’t prepare for it. You just show up and be funny off the cuff. If you prepare material ahead of time, it won’t work. The audience can tell.” Sagal explains that “when you’re in the zone, there’s this wonderful feeling of your mind racing ahead, and you’re able to shape reactions and thoughts as they happen. When it’s clicking, I can start a sentence knowing that I’m going to need to finish the joke with, say, the name of a movie or a historical reference that I don’t know—but I’m just confident that when I get to the punch line, it’ll be there.”

Performances run for 90 minutes or more and are edited to 50-minute broadcasts. “If you say something that’s really stupid, they’ll cut it out,” Blount says. “Or something really funny—sometimes they’ll cut those, too.” Naturally, there’s some horsing around; off-color or overtly political witticisms will also get axed. Sagal, along with his four producers, writes the script of questions and set-ups beforehand, with the panelists kept in the dark. “It’s like basketball,” Blount explains. “Peter brings the ball down the court and he will pass off to one of us—you can either take a shot, or dribble and pass it to someone else.” The one segment that allows advance preparation is the “bluff,” in which one panelist reads a genuine, if bizarre, news story and two others invent equally ridiculous fictional stories on the same topic and try to bluff a listener on the phone into thinking theirs is the genuine article. “The night before, they tell us the topic and who has the real story,” says Blount.

Panelists can also prepare by boning up on the news in the week before their appearances. Sagal is a confessed news addict, Rocca grew up in Washington, D.C., “where you can’t escape current events,” and Blount says, “I’m a newspaper junkie. I thought the show would give me an excuse to read all the newspapers I read anyway. The one week a month when I’m on, I read even more than I want to.”

Then, on Thursday nights, the audiences stream in, the recording devices roll, and the persiflage flies. It’s much like a conversation among friends—the panelists all get along and like each other. “There’s all sorts of room for personality,” Rocca says. “The audience appreciates the individual quirks of the panelists. It’s not always about a big joke. If you were just a joke-telling machine without personality, that wouldn’t be as interesting.” Sagal’s wit is a sharp as any panelist’s, but he recognizes that “it’s not my job to be funny, but to make funny possible, and make sure everybody’s having a good time.” Blount notes, “We’re not trying to top each other. It’s a cooperative effort, a team thing.” Afterward, cast and crew will typically unwind at a nearby bar over a drink and a nosh—and occasionally, perhaps, reflect on an axiom coined by radio personality and actor Harry Shearer: “Truth is funnier than anything you can make up.”

37 Comments

Comments 1-10 (page )

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture
Frederick Roberts wrote:

Learning this program has Harvard roots was a jolt. I enjoy humor, but to me this NPR program is irritating, tiresomely obnoxious, and in Portland OR takes up much of Saturday afternoon.

EVERYONE I know familiar with the program agrees. If I meet an exception, I will rush to share it.

Maybe the humor is from another country though the program wiseacres’ accents are American. My and others’ view is they are not really funny and have not a clue how heavy-handed they are, so they never know when to stop. Clearly, however, they love their own cracks.

December 21, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Meredith Bagley '99 replied:

I’ll be your exception, Frederick, as I rue the weekend that I miss WWDTM on my Austin affliate KUT 90.5. In fact, my best birthday present last year was to attend the live taping here in town with featured guest Robert Earl Keen. Roy Blount was on the panel that week but was not aware then of his and Sagal’s Crimson roots. I love the witty one liner banter and can tell you first hand that editors have a very tough job to squish it into 50 minutes. Yes, occasionally Charlie Piece dominates or Kerry O’Connor is a bit squeaky but for more often the show finds that happy mix of humor without snark, informed opinion without dry NPR delivery — much like my reunion conversations in Cambridge. Give it another try?

December 22, 2009
Anonymous's picture
tom worthen replied:

fr .. lighten up .. get some new friends t

December 23, 2009
Anonymous's picture
David Goldman replied:

Frederick, I’m another exception — and I’m in Portland OR, too.

December 25, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Sue replied:

No need to rush Frederick since I don’t really care if you or anyone else you know likes the show. I’m happy to keep listening. As, obviously, many others are and that is what keeps this great show on the air.

December 31, 2009
Anonymous's picture
John Ett replied:

I also live in Portland and the show is on for one hour in the morning. Perhaps you’re mistaking terrific Wait Wait for the tiresome two hour Feldman show that follows.

December 31, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Bart King replied:

Portlander Alert: I take exception! (Wait, I AM the exception.)

December 31, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Glenn Fleishman replied:

“in Portland OR takes up much of Saturday afternoon.”

That’s extraordinary! In Seattle, it’s only about 45 minutes. Can I have some of your water, please?

Also, we have these things called computers which plug into something known as the interwebs, which allows us to listen to music and spoken word performances at places and times of our convenience.

December 31, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Josh replied:

I’m a big Wait Wait fan from the Portland area. I’d imagine that the reason they started running the show in the Portland market -and continue to do- so is that people [gasp!] enjoy it. Your average media outlet, television or radio, typically does not play for long shows that the audience _dislikes_.

December 31, 2009
Anonymous's picture
Marlene M. replied:

Sorry, FR. I’m another Portlander firmly in the WWDTM fan camp! Especially love Sagal and Poundstone.

December 31, 2009

Add a new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
In case we need to contact you to verify your identity.
In most cases, this will not be used, and it will never be shared or made public.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.
  • You may use [discuss] or [extra] tags to display icon and optionally linked callout such as "Extra or Join the Conversation".

Copyright ©1996—2010
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster