Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • An episode Kenya would rather forget: Megan Shutzer '10 examines the lasting effects of the 2007 election violence http://ow.ly/E6Wo 12 hours 53 min ago
  • Telling the stories of mental illness and mental-health care in Ghana http://ow.ly/E6Uy 13 hours 44 min ago

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Browse investment properties, homes, homesites, and real estate. Find them at www.therealestatehomeguide.com/ investment-property/.

View more classifieds

The Virtue in Vice

The Poor Payoff of Pleasure Postponed

by Elizabeth Gudrais

 

Photograph by Webb Chappell

In her research, Anat Keinan asks people to reflect on their regrets over choices made in the near and distant past.

For all the hand-wringing over their failure to amass savings, Americans may actually be too disciplined. So says Harvard Business School assistant professor Anat Keinan.

A need to feel efficient, and a tendency to feel guilty when we do something “just for fun,” may be universally human. But the Israeli-born Keinan says productivity-obsessed Americans take this to an extreme, viewing pleasurable pastimes as wasteful, irresponsible, and even immoral. Keinan and Columbia Business School professor Ran Kivetz call this hyperopia—the habit of overestimating the benefits one will receive in the future from making responsible decisions now. They write that this phenomenon—the name, drawn from ophthalmology, means “farsightedness”—works to our detriment by driving people “to underconsume precisely those products and experiences that they enjoy the most.”

Keinan began thinking about hyperopia after noting a trend among fellow doctoral students at Columbia: she and her friends complained about not having had enough fun as undergraduates, but they were still staying in on weekends and passing up travel opportunities in favor of work or studies. She wondered why they seemed stuck in these remorse-inducing behavior patterns.

Keinan and Kivetz set out to see if they could observe, in formal studies, people overestimating discipline’s payoff and underestimating future feelings of having missed out. Time after time, when subjects were asked to recall situations in which they had to choose between work and pleasure, their responses emulated those of the Columbia doctoral students. More of the subjects who’d chosen play over work recently expressed regret, but those numbers reversed for choices made in the distant past. For instance, college students said they’d spent too much time relaxing during a recent winter break, but when they considered the previous year’s break, they said they’d spent too much time studying and working.

Keinan and Kivetz, “Repenting Hyperopia: An Analysis of Self Control Regrets,” Journal of Consumer Research, September 2006

Regrets About Work Versus Pleasure. When people are asked to recall a situation that occurred either last week or at least five years ago, in which they had to choose between work and pleasure, they rate their levels of regret differently. For decisions made within the last week, subjects are more likely to regret having chosen enjoyment over work. But when considering decisions made more than five years ago, the opposite is true: more subjects regret choosing work.


Whether the choices offered were a week’s vacation versus a week of work with extra pay, a drug-store gift certificate versus a subscription to a popular magazine, or chocolate cake versus fruit salad, the free-spirited choice invariably induced more guilt in the near term—but over time, Keinan reports, regrets about pleasures forgone became more salient than satisfaction at having acted responsibly. These results also held true for study participants recruited in airports, bus and train stations, and public parks.

There are indications that we are aware of this psychological process, at some level: the results were the same even when subjects were prompted to consider hypothetical future regrets—or to make actual choices in real time. When offered five dollars in cash versus a box of chocolate truffles as a study-participation reward, subjects cued to think about the distant future were more likely to choose the instant gratification of sweets.

Based on interviews conducted for some of the studies, Keinan suspects that groups at each extreme are exceptions—overachievers so driven that they lose all capacity to take pleasure in leisure activities, and people leading lives so thoroughly hedonistic that they have no responsible decisions to regret. But “most of us,” she says, “are in the middle. We think it’s important to work and have goals and accomplish them, but also think that other things”—family, friends, physical fitness, hobbies—“are important.” 

Keinan teaches marketing, and admits that companies could capitalize on this bias in human decisionmaking (for instance, by placing ads to cue anticipation of future regret over that family vacation never taken). But a broader application is helping people make choices that make them happier. “Why,” she asks, “do we have to wait until we are 60 or 70 to realize what’s really important to us?” The formula she suggests: recognize the tendency to prioritize short-term guilt over late-in-life regrets and make decisions that emphasize the long view. This also helps determine when taking the vacation is not the right decision: “If you think, ‘Ten years from now I’m going to wish I finished this project on time,’ then that’s probably the right thing to do.” She even offers an approach to assuage guilt for die-hard productivity devotees: frame a frivolous choice now as an investment in fond memories and future happiness.

More Articles by Elizabeth Gudrais

November-December 2009

Institutional, International

November-December 2009

Destination Nollywood

November-December 2009

A Better Bed-Net Strategy

November-December 2009

A Leap of Faith, and a Prayer Answered

November-December 2009

Finding Sunshine in the Slum

Issues > September-October 2009 > Right Now

September-October 2009

Architecture That Imitates Life

September-October 2009

Facial Pheenoms

September-October 2009

The Oldest Object

  1. August 27, 2009

    Is there more detailed info for “The Poor Payoff of Pleasure Postponed” that readers could access if you added a link in the online version of Harvard Magazine?

    The article had enough information to stimulate interest and to raise more questions but not to satisfy. For example: What about alternative explanations for the results? Might our memories of pleasure denied be exaggerated over memories of the benefits of work accomplished? Despite their feelings of regret, might the overall happiness of individuals who postponed pleasure be greater (due to long term success and career advancement) than the overall happiness of those who sought instant gratification and had less career success? Was the data collected in a manner that would allow more detailed analysis to account for social/cultural/class/economic differences? The article looks at subjects who chose work over play but what about subjects who chose play over work?

    The research sounds very interesting and the results credible but at this point I wonder: Would Keinan’s fellow doctoral students at Columbia even be doctoral students at Columbia if they had not chosen work over play more often than not?

    ~David B Freeman

  2. August 27, 2009

    So this is not new. I came up with this a while back just thinking to myself. I’ve actually even come up with a framework for solving the problem by allowing people to systematically think through trade-offs and decision-timing.

    You provide problems. I identified the problem before (as I’m sure others have as well) and have a solution.

    ~Manny Duenas

  3. August 31, 2009

    As a foreigner, I could not agree more with the trouble/guilt so m any people in America find with laying back, relaxing, and forgetting about work for a while.

    May I say though, that the geekiness of the analysis (do we really need a graph to portray the point?) suggests the author might share the very disease she discusses in her research.

    ~Jon

  4. September 1, 2009

    I would be very interested to know if there are comparable studies with other cultures that have a reputation with more support for short-term gratification (e.g., Italy or France)….

    ~Michael Otten

  5. September 9, 2009

    Very interesting and nice to read

    thank you

    ~aleeswari dhandapani

  6. September 12, 2009

    Interesting… My girlfriend sent this article to me—with good reason I suppose.

    I studied in a school in New Delhi, India, run by the Irish Brothers Association who did a fabulous job in hammering an education into us (literally!) but left us with an underlying feeling of worthlessness. They were very strict and it was usual to see a few students outside the headmaster’s office waiting (for a long time sometimes, to heighten the tension) to be caned for various offences ranging from forgetting a book at home to not doing homework or any other real or imagined act of indiscipline.

    I have always attributed my feelings of guilt which occur sometimes, to the above—while having fun or taking a break from work among other things. I think this makes us (my batchmates and me) work very hard and most of us have done well. At the same time I still see a lot of us feeling not “good enough” and striving to do more and achieve more.

    I makes me feel a lot better knowing that there are other people in the US and probably all over the world who feel the same way!

    ~Arvind Passi

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster