Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • Eliot Spitzer to speak on institutional corruption at Harvard's Safra Foundation Center for Ethics http://ow.ly/zSTd 1 day 15 hours ago
  • The Undergraduate: Melanie Long ’10 writes about her decision to leave pre-med behind http://ow.ly/zSEs 1 day 17 hours ago

 STAY CONNECTED

    

ARIZONA: Scottsdale, Paradise Valley & Carefree. Rox Stewart, Princeton ’63, Russ Lyon Sotheby’s International Realty, 602-316-6504; E-mail: rox.stewart@russlyon.com.

View more classifieds

Anthony Woods: Taking a Stand

by Elizabeth Gudrais

 

Stu Rosner

Anthony Woods

For a March 2009 update on Anthony Woods, see this post on our blog.

Keywords

ROTC

When Anthony C. Woods, M.P.P. ’08, delivered the graduate English address at Commencement last June (shown at right), he had just made a momentous decision: to publicly acknowledge his homosexuality and effectively end a military career that had spanned nine years and two tours in Iraq.

Woods did not mention this decision in his speech. Soon after, though, the West Point graduate and U.S. Army captain informed his commander that he was gay, initiating his dismissal under the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In early November, Woods learned he would be “eliminated” from the army on the grounds of “moral and professional dereliction” and required to repay $35,000—the amount of his scholarship to attend the Kennedy School.

A military career may seem a curious choice for a young man who is gay or even questioning his orientation. But for the son of a single mother, growing up in an Air Force town in northern California, acceptance to West Point was an honor—and an opportunity—beyond compare. Woods focused on the professional to the exclusion of the personal; with the country at war, that wasn’t hard. But two years at Harvard gave him space to think—and to face his dismal prospects for upward mobility in an organization with an explicit homosexuality ban and a strong culture of marriage and children. Even if he had stayed closeted, he says, “It wasn’t going to be possible for me to fit the mold, and I knew that because of that, there was going to be a glass ceiling.”

Even after the invasive court-martial process—the military conducts interviews with friends and family to verify homosexuality, presumably to prevent fraud, for instance by soldiers who wish to avoid an additional tour in Iraq—Woods is reluctant to malign the officers who carried out his investigation. He says they are simply implementing a policy. Change might come from Congress, but Woods believes the Supreme Court is a more likely venue: “I think it’s going to take a landmark court case, like Brown v. Board of Education.”

As recently as a year ago, Woods thought life after Harvard would include at least five more years of military service. He had been accepted to teach at West Point—“a huge, huge dream,” he says. Now, even as he waits to hear whether his discharge will be honorable or dishonorable, Woods has begun a new chapter: while working as staff secretary to New York governor David Paterson, he is applying to law school. He dreams of a role in changing the policy that cut his own dreams short. But his decision to come out already constitutes a significant first step. “If this policy’s ever going to go away,” he says, “they have to lose talented people. It’s not going to go away unless it hurts.”

More Articles by Elizabeth Gudrais

January-February 2010

Work/llfe balance

November-December 2009

Institutional, International

November-December 2009

Destination Nollywood

November-December 2009

A Better Bed-Net Strategy

November-December 2009

A Leap of Faith, and a Prayer Answered

Issues > January-February 2009 > The Alumni

January-February 2009

Taking It to the Streets

January-February 2009

Educational Activist

January-February 2009

Natural Baker

January-February 2009

The SIGnboard

January-February 2009

Storytelling Scholar

January-February 2009

A Record-Breaker Passes

January-February 2009

Comings and Goings

January-February 2009

A Special Notice Regarding Commencement Exercises

  1. January 5, 2009

    This is stupid - it’s time for the American military to crawl into the 21st century

    ~Brad

  2. January 7, 2009

    Tony Woods is a brave, intelligent, and remarkable individual. The army is losing one of its best as a result of this homophobic and prejudiced policy. Here’s hoping that his stand will effect change.

    ~Caroline

  3. March 9, 2009

    “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is not an Army policy or an American Military policy. “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is a law that was passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton.

    Before the American Military is allowed to “crawl into the 21st Century” Congress must pass a new bill and President Obama must sign it into law.

    Democrats control both houses and the Presidency, so what’s taking so long…

    ~Ed

  4. March 17, 2009

    President Clinton signed Don’t Ask, Don’t tell because the military actively fought a more progressive policy, and made some nasty threats against the President.

    ~Kit+

  5. April 2, 2009

    Kit,

    Please do not call President Clinton a coward!

    ~Ed

  6. April 16, 2009

    DADT jeopardizes U.S. military preparedness. Woods’ case shows how. Since 1993, nearly 12,000 service members have been dismissed under DADT, including almost 800 with language and other skills deemed ‘mission-critical’ by the Department of Defense. In addition, since DADT went into effect, more than 25,000 officers and enlisted personnel have voluntarily decided to curtail their military careers due to DADT issues, according to recent UCLA study. More than 40,000 others have been dissuaded from considering enlistment. It is time for Congress to repeal DADT.

    ~Thomas F. ("Tom") Field, Colonel, USAR (Ret,)

  7. April 20, 2009

    Thanks, Col. Field, for pointing out the economic waste of this policy. The untold costs, however, are human ones. I am now ‘over 50’ and I look back at the “witchhunts” conducted by the Army to ferret us out (in the ’70s) and the “lies we have told” in the DADT days with so much sadness and anger.

    I am glad I was younger then, and lived life with much more abandon. We thought it was a game and many of us did not know just what a dishonorable discharge would do to our lives. I also did not realize my own self-worth—and the military capitalizes on our youthful naivete. But the wounds are deep and grow wider with age because they were inflicted not by an enemy, but by my own country.

    Mr. Woods—-stand tall and be proud. You have much to offer this world and our country, and your public service will serve you well. Knock down a few more doors, young man, and teach the generation that follows to be proud.

    Thank you.

    ~1LT/Drill Sgt. Becky, US Army & USAR (Ret.)

  8. April 26, 2009

    Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is a very important policy that helps the Army maintain its combat readiness. If there is a homosexual in a unit and everyone knows about it, it will negatively affect the unit. If there is an openly gay member in a unit, Soldiers will be thinking about other things instead of preparing for war (esp. considering the partner assisted PT the Army requires, the open men’s locker rooms, administering first aid to a possible HIV infected person, etc). I have nothing against homosexuals but I think DADT is a policy that should stay- for the good of the Army.

    ~Mark

  9. April 27, 2009

    If you are gay, then why join an organization that doesn’t want you there to begin with? Seems to me these are the individuals who are wasting the governments time and money. Why not join an organization where their choice of being a homosexual is not an issue? I don’t get it. Did they think they would just walk a fine line forever? They could easily find another profession to serve in.

    The military is a conservative sub-culture of our society. Marriage and family is a very strong part of who we are. There is no need to force homosexuality on it. It’s not needed or wanted and yes, it will hurt readiness and probably retention as well.

    I think what we need to do is find out why we have people becoming homosexual in the first place. Tony Woods apparently lacked a male role model in his life and that’s a shame, but I suspect that has something to do with it. It’s not his fault. He is now what he is and we still need him to be a productive member of society. He just needs to choose an area where he will better serve.

    ~Rich, COL U.S. Army

  10. April 30, 2009

    Colonel Rich,

    I can answer your question. Anthony Woods joined the military for the same reasons that millions of other young people have done so; he had a desire to serve his country, protect his homeland, and risk his life serving in the greatest army in the world.

    This is the same reason why I joined the Army, and why I accepted an appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point (I graduated in 1991).

    But there is a big difference between me and Anthony Woods. Woods had his resolve tested under fire in multiple combat depoyments as a junior military officer; something I never had to do. With two wars raging and others on the horizon this is a treacherous time for America, it disturbs me to see the Army turning away an intelligent, West Point trained, Harvard educated, battle tested combat arms officer.

    Your argument, in a nutshell, seems to be that we should dismiss soldiers like Anthony Woods, regardless of their courage and competence under fire, simply because they make other soldiers uncomfortable. The experiences of other advanced western armies such as Britain and Israel suggest arguments being made for dismissing homosexual soldiers simply don’t add up. In practice, the presence of homosexual soldiers does not negatively impact unit cohesion. I’m sure when Captain Woods was leading American soldiers against the enemy in Iraq that his subordinates would have been quite unconcerned with his sexual orientation.

    We’re allowing the prejudices of a few to perpetuate an outdated policy which underminds national security and makes Americans less safe. It’s time for us to move into the 21st century.

    Not only am I pulling for Anthony Woods in his CA special election race, I’m sending him a check today.

    ~Christopher Smith, Houston TX, USMA 1991

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster