Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • An episode Kenya would rather forget: Megan Shutzer '10 examines the lasting effects of the 2007 election violence http://ow.ly/E6Wo 3 hours 13 min ago
  • Telling the stories of mental illness and mental-health care in Ghana http://ow.ly/E6Uy 4 hours 5 min ago

 STAY CONNECTED

    

SabbaticalHomes.com. Worldwide home-exchanges, rentals, and housesitting opportunities by and for academics since 2000.

View more classifieds

Running on Wind?

 

Michael B. McElroy’s research group has launched an extensive program to define the potential of wind power as a source of electricity worldwide. The study capitalizes on a unique meteorology database developed by the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. Validated by hundreds of regional and global air-quality studies, this data resource refines understanding of meteorologically dependent new energy sources, notably wind and solar, and can powerfully inform national and international strategies for their exploitation.

The database provides a record of wind activity every three hours averaged over a spatial grid with individual grid elements measuring 1-degree longitude by 1-degree latitude (equivalent to the area defined by a 100-kilometer by 100-kilometer square at mid-latitudes, less at high latitudes, more at low latitudes) covering the entire globe. The McElroy group uses these data to calculate the electricity that could be generated by deploying specific wind turbines. Samples of preliminary results for the United States appear in the accompanying figures. They show, for example, that even for such populous, high-consumption states as California, Texas, and Florida, the potential for electricity generated by wind far exceeds total current consumption.

The results displayed assume deployment of 1.5-megawatt turbines throughout the entire country, excluding unsuitable regions such as urban and forested areas. The study identifies the variability of the wind source, allowing researchers to explore how it could be exploited in an integrated electrical system that must match variable supply to demand. It is worth noting in this context that the batteries on an expanded fleet of plug-in hybrid vehicles could provide an important opportunity for storage of electricity at times when the potential production might exceed the immediate demand. Future work will incorporate realistic economic constraints, such as: costs for installing turbines in specific regions and for extending the electrical grid to distribute the added power; electricity prices; and different turbine designs. The studies could also take into account the effects of future global climate change.

The data presented define the potential or maximum power that could be generated using wind. Although these results are restricted to onshore deployment in the United States, the study identifies the potential for wind power offshore as well, and for the globe as a whole. The potential U.S. supply could be increased by about 20 percent if turbines were installed offshore within viable distances from the coast and sea depths, notably in the Northeast and on the West Coast. To date, it has proven difficult to site wind farms in densely populated coastal regions such as Nantucket Sound. There is minimal opposition, however, to placing turbines in more sparsely populated regions of the continental interior, where landowners are now receiving annual rents of up to $3,000 for the installation of a single turbine on their property (siting that has minimal impact on other uses of the real estate).

The accompanying figures were prepared by graduate student Xi Lu, using 2001 as a representative model year.



Responses to “Running on Wind?

  1. June 24, 2009

    Congratulations !!! very good research !!!

    ~Marcelo Cunha

  2. October 19, 2009

    Terrific paper. Refutes the notion that we need to (further) subsidize nukes. And underlines the need for a serious carbon pricing system to tilt the tables away from coal and toward renewables.

    See http://www.carbontax.org for more information about the advantages of a revenue-neutral carbon fee.

    ~James Handley

  3. October 22, 2009

    Nice study and well-conceived graphics to represent the findings. Would be preferable to complete the next steps of looking at practical and economic constraints before publicizing the results.

    Two smaller errors:
    1. The idea that the public opposes offshore wind is a Massachusetts-centric view. Offshore wind, in sight, is strongly supported in most other coastal states, as documented in the peer-reviewed literature (see this PDF file), and we expect that it will be on Cape Cod eventually as well.

    2. Atlantic offshore wind alone can provide MUCH more than 20% of US electricity, the NE Coastal Atlantic alone would generate a practical (after exclusions) average power of 330 GW as documented in Georphysical Research Letters (see this PDF file).

    ~Willett Kempton, University of Delaware

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster