|
November-December 2006
|
Interim AgendasAlthough Derek Bok and Jeremy R. Knowles are serving as president and dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS), respectively, on an interim basis, both have articulated ambitious agendas engaging large University issues.
In interviews with this and other publications (see www.president.harvard.edu), Bok outlined “a much more active year, with much more important substantive issues, than one might have expected” when he agreed last February to return to Massachusetts Hall for a limited time. He highlighted three such priorities.
Knowles, following a period of turmoil within FAS, intends above all to make the faculty’s affairs transparent—to build common understanding of issues that a successor dean will have to address in the long-term best interest of the College and the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
An overarching concern, he indicated, would be to bring “clarity” to FAS’s fiscal position. The Resources Committee projected last January that costs for adding professors (the ladder-faculty ranks have grown by 56, to 719, in just the past three years) and financing and operating nearly $750 million in new buildings would result in a yawning financial gap by 2010 (see “Fraught Finances,” March-April, page 61). Knowles put FAS on an austerity budget during his first deanship, but the structural deficits looming now—prospectively, several tens of millions of dollars annually—are not susceptible to a quick fix during his current, brief term. He aims, instead, to explain FAS’s assets and cash flows in unprecedented detail during faculty meetings this fall, engaging fellow professors in thinking through the necessary actions. Knowles, a chemist, also expects to detail the complex issues of science planning: the institutional innovations required to support collaborative research while sustaining teaching, and the appointments needed to make use of the new facilities (most are for science). He suggested that he might also address faculty hiring generally, taking stock of the recent rapid growth in FAS relative to planned research objectives and to teaching goals emerging from the curriculum review and the new teaching committee. Finally, in recent years, Allston planning has proceeded as an activity largely separate from the faculty. So Knowles said he hoped to explain how FAS’s future was not threatened by growth there; to the contrary, he perceives important opportunities for the faculty in the choices made for Allston, which will in time extend far beyond the science investments now taking shape. |
||||||