Palace Pottery

The art and science of Jun ware

Photograph courtesy of Harvard Art Museums; ©President and Fellows of Harvard College

Even the Qing emperors, nearly four centuries ago, recognized Song dynasty (960-1279) Jun ware—a distinctive opalescent blue, sometimes splashed with organic-seeming, almost foliate lobes of plum—as one of the five great achievements of China’s astonishing ceramic legacy. In contemporary perspective, Jun techniques in fact persisted much longer, at least into the Ming era (1368-1644): the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.


Photograph courtesy of Harvard Art Museums; ©President and Fellows of Harvard College

 

One unusual set of such vessels is the subject of Harvard Art Museums’ exhibition “Adorning the Inner Court,” on display through August 13. For his fiftieth reunion, Ernest B. Dane, A.B. 1892, and his wife, Helen Pratt Dane, donated a ceramic and jade collection to the museum, including 60 pieces of “Numbered Jun” ware: various lobed and rectangular pots (with holes to drain water) and footed basins, mostly. All are numbered (1 for largest, 10 for smallest), and from inscriptions on the bottom, imperial collection catalogs, and scenes in a few paintings, they appear to have been used for growing bulbs and small plants in the Forbidden City. Dworsky associate curator of Chinese art Melissa Moy, who began studying the pieces (about half of which are exhibited) for her master’s thesis, notes that some of the inscriptions tie to the Hall of Mental Cultivation and other rooms in the palace.

 


Click on arrow for a gallery of conservation and analytical images of the collection
Photograph courtesy of Harvard Art Museums; ©President and Fellows of Harvard College

Despite that evidence, mysteries abound. The dating of the work is imprecise, and the methods of manufacture resist modern replication. The precise modeling (exact alignment of interior and exterior indentations), perfection of shapes (see the lobed flowerpot and basin, at top) , and forms (such as the vase, below right), Moy says, suggest the late fourteenth century, when Ming ceramicists began using dual interior and exterior molds. Demand would have arisen from construction of the Forbidden City. But there are few objects to study and compare (Harvard’s collection of the numbered ware is the largest outside Beijing and Taipei).


Photograph courtesy of Harvard Art Museums; ©President and Fellows of Harvard College

 

Susan Costello, associate conservator of objects and sculpture, has x-rayed all 60 specimens. Swirls and striations under the glaze reveal that they were wheel-thrown before finishing in the molds. (She has also done masterly restoration of some samples.) The stoneware pieces were fired at high temperatures (1,200 degrees centigrade). Iron in the clay helped to produce the blue or green; copper oxide or metallic copper produced the plum or red. Beal Family postdoctoral fellow in conservation science Lucy Cooper has used x-ray fluorescence and a scanning electron microscope to see how the thickness of the glazes and their firing affect the result: tiny globules of glass in the glaze, smaller than the wavelength of blue light, scatter that color; what viewers see is primarily structural, not a pigment effect. More remains to be learned about the relative chemical composition of clay and glaze, and variances in firing, to fully understand the product.

That essential science aside, modern viewers, like Ming collectors or the diligent Danes, can see the plainly ravishing result.

Harvrd Art Museums has launched an online resource, Numbered Jun Ware Special Collection, that explores the collection’s many complexities through descriptive summaries of its typology, technical characteristics, controversies, and collecting history, accompanied by a selection of representative images. For related gallery talks, in English and Mandarin Chinese, to be given throughout the duration of the exhibition, check the museums’ calendar.   

Read more articles by: John S. Rosenberg

You might also like

“It’s Tournament Time”

Harvard women’s basketball prepares for Ivy Madness.

A Harvard Agenda Shaped by Speech

The work underway in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences

Dialogue, not Debate

American University’s Lara Schwartz, J.D. ’98, teaches productive disagreement.

Most popular

alt text here

AWOL from Academics

Behind students' increasing pull toward extracurriculars

Lola Mullaney, Coach Carrie Moore, and Elena Rodriguez

“It’s Tournament Time”

Harvard women’s basketball prepares for Ivy Madness.

View of Harvard University campus from the Charles River

Why Americans Love to Hate Harvard

The president emeritus on elite universities’ academic accomplishments—and a rising tide of antagonism

More to explore

Winthrop Bell

Brief life of a philosopher and spy: 1884-1965

Talking about Talking

Fostering healthy disagreement

A Dogged Observer

Novelist and psychiatrist Daniel Mason takes the long view.