Your independent source for Harvard news since 1898 | SUBSCRIBE

Your independent source for Harvard news since 1898

News

Expert Opinion: Avian Flu Experiments Pose Public Health Risk

5.20.14

Marc Lipsitch

Marc Lipsitch

Photograph by Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard Public Affairs and Communications

Experiments that make virulent avian flu strains more transmissible among mammals put the public’s health at unnecessary risk, and therefore raise ethical concerns, write Harvard professor of epidemiology Marc Lipsitch and Yale professor Alison Galvani in a policy forum article, “Ethical Alternatives to Experiments with Novel Potential Pandemic Pathogens,” that appeared Tuesday in PLoS Medicine. Lipsitch, director of the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard School of Public Health, and Galvani, who directs the Center for Infectious Disease Modeling at Yale, call for greater scrutiny of such experiments.

The aim of research that manipulates the transmissibility of avian flu is the improvement of surveillance methods and vaccine design, but Lipsitch and Galvani argue that even when such research is conducted under high levels of biosecurity, the risk of accidental release and global spread, though small, outweighs any potential benefits. They urge the U.S. government and other funders to “consider the risk and whether we could gain the same or greater public health benefits from spending the same money and resources on safer experiments.” Lipsitch raised this issue last year, as described in this magazine, when a year-long global ban on such experimentation was coming to an end.

You Might Also Like:

hotograph of demonstrators in front of the federal courthouse in Boston where the SFFA v. Harvard trial took place, with signs reading "Harvard No More Racial Stereotyping" and "My Race Should Not Hurt Me In Admissions.

In October 2018, supporters of Students for Fair Admissions hold signs in front of the federal courthouse where the admissions trial took place.

Photograph by Alamy Images

Admissions Lawsuit, Round Two

Loeb House, where the University’s governing boards convene
Photograph by Harvard Magazine/JC

Harvard Governing Boards Change Overseers

According to the data set assembled by Harvard Law School scholars, black and Latinx people are overrepresented in Massachusetts criminal caseload compared to their population in the state. White people make up 74.3 percent of the state’s population and are defendants in in 58.7 percent of cases. Black people make up 6.5 percent of the population and are defendants in 17.1 percent of cases. Latinx people make up 8.7 percent of the population, and are defendants in in 18.3 percent of cases. Click on image to view full graphic

Source: Massachusetts Racial Disparity Report

A Major Disparity in Massachusetts Criminal Justice

You Might Also Like:

hotograph of demonstrators in front of the federal courthouse in Boston where the SFFA v. Harvard trial took place, with signs reading "Harvard No More Racial Stereotyping" and "My Race Should Not Hurt Me In Admissions.

In October 2018, supporters of Students for Fair Admissions hold signs in front of the federal courthouse where the admissions trial took place.

Photograph by Alamy Images

Admissions Lawsuit, Round Two

Loeb House, where the University’s governing boards convene
Photograph by Harvard Magazine/JC

Harvard Governing Boards Change Overseers

According to the data set assembled by Harvard Law School scholars, black and Latinx people are overrepresented in Massachusetts criminal caseload compared to their population in the state. White people make up 74.3 percent of the state’s population and are defendants in in 58.7 percent of cases. Black people make up 6.5 percent of the population and are defendants in 17.1 percent of cases. Latinx people make up 8.7 percent of the population, and are defendants in in 18.3 percent of cases. Click on image to view full graphic

Source: Massachusetts Racial Disparity Report

A Major Disparity in Massachusetts Criminal Justice