Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Inaugural Addresses Then and Now

January 13, 2009

 

Michael S. Oberman, J.D. ’72, a New York attorney, reminds us that “My Fellow Citizens…,” his exhaustive look at U.S. presidential inaugural addresses appeared in these pages in January-February 1977.

Jill Lepore, Kemper professor of American history and chair of the history and literature program, takes a more light-hearted look at the form in “The Speech,” published in the January 12 issue of the New Yorker. She finds an evolution in presidential concerns, from a focus on adhering to the Constitution toward a more populist form of appealing directly to the American people. And she discovers unexpectedly affecting eloquence in the address made by James Garfield, elected in 1880, who concluded as follows, in a passage that resonates for January 20, 2009:

My countrymen, we do not now differ in our judgment concerning the controversies of past generations, and 50 years hence our children will not be divided in their opinions concerning our controversies. They will surely bless their fathers and their fathers’ God that the Union was preserved, that slavery was overthrown, and that both races were made equal before the law. We may hasten or we may retard, but we can not prevent, the final reconciliation.

Lepore is coauthor of a new historical novel, Blindspot, covered in the November-December 2008 Harvard Magazine.

  1. March 18, 2009

    great blog. thank you

    ~Mark Dream

  2. April 6, 2009

    My countrymen, we do not now differ in our judgment concerning the controversies of past generations, and 50 years hence our children will not be divided in their opinions concerning our controversies. They will surely bless their fathers and their fathers’ God that the Union was preserved, that slavery was overthrown, and that both races were made equal before the law. We may hasten or we may retard, but we can not prevent, the final reconciliation.

    ~Mike

  3. August 4, 2009

    Wow, Jimmy Carter, Nixon, Adams, Washing, Roosevelt, Kennedy, you got them all. Very good reading and post.
    Thank you.

    ~Denver Attorney

  4. August 11, 2009

    have never thought about it like that before. Thanks so much for the depth and understanding at which you covered the topic. it’s a useful piece of information not only for me but for many others. have read a lot on the topic at different blogs and books but this piece really gives food for thought

    ~hitcliff

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster