Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • November 21, 2009: Harvard 14, Yale 10 - Two late-game touchdowns secure another Crimson victory at Yale Bowl. http://ow.ly/163rbM 2 hours 10 min ago
  • An episode Kenya would rather forget: Megan Shutzer '10 examines the lasting effects of the 2007 election violence http://ow.ly/E6Wo 1 day 3 hours ago

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Berlin/Germany. Apartment short-term rental, 2+ rooms, fully furnished, owned by Harvard emeritus. EU 250 week, 900 month. dbrink0612@yahoo.com, +49-30-881-27-44.

View more classifieds

Anthony Woods: Taking a Stand

by Elizabeth Gudrais

 

Stu Rosner

Anthony Woods

For a March 2009 update on Anthony Woods, see this post on our blog.

Keywords

ROTC

When Anthony C. Woods, M.P.P. ’08, delivered the graduate English address at Commencement last June (shown at right), he had just made a momentous decision: to publicly acknowledge his homosexuality and effectively end a military career that had spanned nine years and two tours in Iraq.

Woods did not mention this decision in his speech. Soon after, though, the West Point graduate and U.S. Army captain informed his commander that he was gay, initiating his dismissal under the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In early November, Woods learned he would be “eliminated” from the army on the grounds of “moral and professional dereliction” and required to repay $35,000—the amount of his scholarship to attend the Kennedy School.

A military career may seem a curious choice for a young man who is gay or even questioning his orientation. But for the son of a single mother, growing up in an Air Force town in northern California, acceptance to West Point was an honor—and an opportunity—beyond compare. Woods focused on the professional to the exclusion of the personal; with the country at war, that wasn’t hard. But two years at Harvard gave him space to think—and to face his dismal prospects for upward mobility in an organization with an explicit homosexuality ban and a strong culture of marriage and children. Even if he had stayed closeted, he says, “It wasn’t going to be possible for me to fit the mold, and I knew that because of that, there was going to be a glass ceiling.”

Even after the invasive court-martial process—the military conducts interviews with friends and family to verify homosexuality, presumably to prevent fraud, for instance by soldiers who wish to avoid an additional tour in Iraq—Woods is reluctant to malign the officers who carried out his investigation. He says they are simply implementing a policy. Change might come from Congress, but Woods believes the Supreme Court is a more likely venue: “I think it’s going to take a landmark court case, like Brown v. Board of Education.”

As recently as a year ago, Woods thought life after Harvard would include at least five more years of military service. He had been accepted to teach at West Point—“a huge, huge dream,” he says. Now, even as he waits to hear whether his discharge will be honorable or dishonorable, Woods has begun a new chapter: while working as staff secretary to New York governor David Paterson, he is applying to law school. He dreams of a role in changing the policy that cut his own dreams short. But his decision to come out already constitutes a significant first step. “If this policy’s ever going to go away,” he says, “they have to lose talented people. It’s not going to go away unless it hurts.”

More Articles by Elizabeth Gudrais

November-December 2009

Institutional, International

November-December 2009

Destination Nollywood

November-December 2009

A Better Bed-Net Strategy

November-December 2009

A Leap of Faith, and a Prayer Answered

November-December 2009

Finding Sunshine in the Slum

Issues > January-February 2009 > The Alumni

January-February 2009

Taking It to the Streets

January-February 2009

Educational Activist

January-February 2009

Natural Baker

January-February 2009

The SIGnboard

January-February 2009

Storytelling Scholar

January-February 2009

A Record-Breaker Passes

January-February 2009

Comings and Goings

January-February 2009

A Special Notice Regarding Commencement Exercises

  1. May 1, 2009

    Your sexuality should be a private thing. It is not to be thrown around in others people’s faces. What turns you on is your business- I don’t want to hear about it and I don’t think anyone else does either. It doesn’t matter if you’re straight, lesbian, gay, or otherwise. If you perform under pressure and you’re good at what you do, there’s no reason you can’t do it. The US Military will implement the changes when the legislation is passed- it is among the most progressive organizations in the United States and has always led the way in racial and gender equality. This won’t be any different. In any case I wish Anthony the best of luck.

    ~Rob

  2. May 3, 2009

    I agree Christopher! I too am pulling for Anthony Woods and have already made the first of several contributions. Also, I have begun to rally my social network to support and contribute to Woods.

    Many of my friends are current, former and retired military who endure(ed) DADT. I’ve witnessed and listened to their daily struggles and challenges to include the long-term effects DADT has on military personnel.

    My friends’ face death door daily. How dare me and you not support them to live life without constructing lies daily to serve and protect me and you.

    ~Marcus, Washington DC,

  3. May 4, 2009

    So this guy is a hero? The Army sends him to two years of Harvard with full pay and benefits, then on graduation day he decides he is gay? Is he repayment of $35K, an amount that won’t cover one years tuition, supposed to make that right? It is a shame that this person took an educational opportunity away from one of his fellow officers and then clearly used it for a political launching pad.

    ~CPT Ackerman

  4. May 26, 2009

    To CPT Ackerman,

    Anthony Woods didn’t “decide if he was gay” on graduation day, he made the decision whether or not to divulge the information or whether to “come out” so to speak. Seems to me that you may have a problem with reading comprehension. Go back over the original article and you may want to repost your opinion. The “35k” that he was “given” on his tuition….didn’t he earn that with his two tours in Iraq? Isn’t that one of the benefits that the military promises you in return for serving your country? How did he take an opportunity away from a fellow officer when his fellow officers were afforded the same opportunities that he was? Maybe the military should make sensitivity training mandatory instead of being worried that someone will be “uncomfortable” because they are in the presence of someone who is “different” than they are.

    ~Michael Travis

  5. June 3, 2009

    I have known Anthony since he was in high school, he was like a 4th son to me, he went to school with my boys. It’s really a shame that there even has to be DADT policy anyway!! Anthony is a fine young man with a lot to offer and his “coming out” is his choice and he knew what the consequences would be. When he was accepted to West Point, I was there, he was the happiest and most proud young man. He had so many dreams and wanted to serve his country. We knew he would go places, he is a highly intelligent man who deserves some kudos for coming out knowing the grief he would face. My hope for you Anthony is happiness and follow your new dream, whatever it may be! We miss you. Leslie

    ~Leslie,Vacaville,CA

  6. June 23, 2009

    Michael Travis,

    I am sorry to tell you this, but serving two years in Iraq doesn’t mean the Army will pay for Harvard. Mr. Woods went to Harvard on because he was supposed to teach at West Point. The Army offers very, very few high dollar chances to go to a high cost graduate school. By him going, another Officer did not get the chance to go. Moreover, he got his full pay and benefits (85K a year, leave days, free health care, etc) while attending.

    ~CPT Ackerman

  7. June 28, 2009

    So, a couple of notes here may be helpful in understanding Anthony Woods’ situation. First, his commencement speech was far less about his sexuality as it was about an anti-war stance. He also professed this stance consistently during his time at KSG, so while his rhetoric did get the attention of his peers/superiors, it had nothing to do with him publicly opposing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy. Next, he approached his chain of command, stated he was in violation of the policy, and ASKED to be discharged. That means he volunteered to not fulfill his required service obligation which he incurred in order to go to KSG (how a junior captain gets to go to KSG before attending the Captains Course/ Advanced Course is a bit of a mystery to me because it seems he would have never done company command before teaching at West Point but that’s neither here nor there). The way I read the facts, Mr. Woods got exactly what he wanted (asked for). All that said, I think the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy is antiquated and ultimately does cause our military to either lose some tremendous people and deter many other fine candidates for military service… especially at a time when the military can use every good soldier it can get a hold of.

    ~Leo

  8. July 5, 2009

    “Like many of you, I worked extremely hard to get President Obama elected. During the primaries I campaigned for him in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania…”

    —Anthony Woods

    http://www.anthonywoodsforcongress.com/live.html

    Tony, in case you were confused:

    The political activities of officers and enlisted members of the Active Army, the USAR, and the ARNG are governed by DODD 1344.10 and AR 600-20, paragraph 5-3. The Hatch Act Amendments, 5 U.S.C. §§ 7321 - 7325, and 5 C.F.R. Part 733, only apply to civilian Federal employees (including Federal technicians employed by the National Guard and USAR). The Hatch Act does not apply to military members.
    The restrictions in AR 600-20 apply to soldiers on active duty, which is defined as full-time duty in the active military service of the United States without regard to duration or purpose, including active duty for training, annual training, attendance at military schools, and full-time National Guard duty. They do not apply to inactive duty for training, or to National Guard soldiers serving in state status.
    Full-time National Guard duty is defined in 10 U.S.C. § 101(d)(5) as training or other duty, other than inactive duty, performed by a member of the Army National Guard of the United States in the member’s status as a member of the National Guard of a State or Territory, under 32 U.S.C. §§ 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505, (drills, field exercises, and attendance at military schools) for which the member is entitled to pay from the U.S. or for which the member has waived pay from the U.S.
    Soldiers on Active Duty May Not:
    1. Use their official authority or influence for interfering with an election, soliciting votes for a particular candidate or issue, or requiring or soliciting political contributions from others;
    2. Participate in partisan political management, campaigns, or conventions;
    3. Write and publish partisan political articles that solicit votes for or against a partisan political party or candidate, speak before partisan political gatherings, or participate in partisan political radio or television shows;
    4. Serve in any capacity or be listed as a sponsor of a partisan political club;
    5. Distribute partisan political literature or conduct a political opinion survey under the auspices of a partisan political group;
    6. Use contemptuous words against the President, Vice President, Congress, the Secretaries of the military departments, Defense, or Transportation, and the Governors or legislatures of any state or territory where the soldier is on duty;
    7. Engage in fund-raising activities for partisan political causes on military reservations or in Federal offices or facilities;
    8. Attend partisan political events as official representatives of the Armed Forces.

    Also, an additional question: if “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is repealed, will you renew your commission and pay back your grad school costs?

    Sincerely,
    Todd Hertling

    ~Todd Hertling

  9. July 6, 2009

    Todd:

    1. He didn’t.

    2. He didn’t.

    3. He didn’t.

    4. He didn’t.

    5. No indication he did.

    6. This is a violation of Art. 8 of the UCMJ and no indication he did. Why would you even mention this part of the Code?

    7. He didn’t.

    8. He didn’t.

    (That was a nice cut and paste job, however)
    Being in the military does not strip one othe franchise nor the ability to engage in political debate and elections. I am a JAG and am very familiar with the law. And as for repayment, he did repay. Why not repeal the policy and ask him rather than throw out a question that can not be answered. I am sure many vets would sign up again if the policy was repealed. As an active duty service person currently serving in Iraq let me say this, all those opposed to repeal have no clue what you are talking about. Your views are just plain incorrect and dated.

    ~Paul

  10. July 6, 2009

    Paul,

    Thank your for your resume. As it turns out, I have two combat tours under my belt (a total of 24 months), and one on the way as a combat arms officer and Troop commander. In OIF 3, I served with Mr. Woods and know his true character. With seven years of service myself, I also know something about UCMJ.

    Mr. Woods admits on his Congressional campaign website to having campaigned for President Obama (see the link I posted above). According to law, being an officer in the military does preclude someone from campaigning in an election, which is exactly what Mr. Woods did before he was discharged for disclosing his sexuality (see bullet number 2 in my last posting). I’m not sure where you got your law degree: putting a bumper sticker on your car is one thing; engaging head-on in a presidential campaign while you are on active duty is something else entirely. And he was on official active duty status while a student at Harvard, which makes his actions illegal.

    There are very few on this blog who seem to be noticing that what Mr. Woods did and is doing now (by not paying back his Harvard degree in military service (i.e. his six years — which is what he contracted to do) is legally and morally wrong. As someone who just completed the grad school program and is serving out his commitment in time, I would know. As CPT Ackerman notes, Woods has successfully displaced an officer who may have gone to Harvard and went on to serve the military in his stead. But it was a good launching pad for his campaign, as we can all see.

    As it turns out, I am against “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” I was merely asking Mr. Woods that if he enjoyed serving in the Army so much, and his dreams were shattered by this institution, why not renew his commission if “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is ever overturned? This would validate all of his self-righteous claims. As I have said before, I have no issue whatsoever with Mr. Woods being gay. It just would have been nice to see him disclose this information before he accepted a Harvard scholarship. Let’s call a spade a spade.

    CPT Hertling

    ~Todd Hertling

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster