Skip to content
home Harvard Magazine
E-mail updates

Sign up to be notified of new issues.

View a sample newsletter

Follow Harvard Magazine on Twitter
  • Eliot Spitzer to speak on institutional corruption at Harvard's Safra Foundation Center for Ethics http://ow.ly/zSTd 21 hours 42 min ago
  • The Undergraduate: Melanie Long ’10 writes about her decision to leave pre-med behind http://ow.ly/zSEs 1 day 2 min ago

 STAY CONNECTED

    

Berlin/Germany. Apartment short-term rental, 2+ rooms, fully furnished, owned by Harvard emeritus. EU 250 week, 900 month. dbrink0612@yahoo.com, +49-30-881-27-44.

View more classifieds

The Saga of a Great Headline

The genesis of “Harvard Beats Yale, 29-29”

 

Two mornings after the fact, the Crimson’s headline made the 1968 match-up the ultimate Game in the historic rivalry.

Editor’s note: As the clock ticked down to the 117th Harvard-Yale match-up, Alan Schwarz, senior writer for Baseball America magazine, filed this story.

 

It was supposed to be easy. Asked by American Heritage magazine to select the most overrated and underrated newspaper headlines in history, I knew the winners immediately. The Chicago Tribune’s “Dewey Defeats Truman” 1948 banner took the overrated category because, after all, it gained its immortality simply by being wrong. Meanwhile, the underrated headline would be one that appeared wrong, but was deliciously right: “Harvard Beats Yale, 29-29.” Somebody at the Crimson, with only one little word, had brilliantly captured the essence of the Harvard football team’s legendary comeback (16 points in the final 42 seconds) to tie Yale in November 1968. I would find that somebody.

How hard could that be? “Harvard Beats Yale, 29-29” had to be the most famous headline in Crimson history, its author surely spoken of reverently through the generations, perhaps even honored with a shrine in the newsroom. This would take two or three phone calls, tops. Instead it became the longest, most frustrating, undulating, teasing, and exhausting search I have undertaken in 10 years in journalism—lasting three months and consisting of 117 phone calls, 83 Internet searches, and thousands of hairs I’ll never see again. I tracked down a Federal Court of Appeals judge, an Internet magnate, Ring Lardner’s grandson, and 10 other candidates before finally finding my white whale.

 

Phone call number one went to the Harvard sports information office, whose copy of the famous paper listed Peter Lennon ’70, M.P.A. ’78, and Scott Jacobs ’71 as co-authors of the main story on the 1968 Game. They’d surely know. Well, Lennon’s phone number wasn’t listed anywhere, but Jacobs’s was. Jacobs said that, while he didn’t come up with the headline, he knew four excellent candidates who either did or would know: Joel Kramer ’69, Crimson president at the time; James Glassman ’69, the managing editor; the newspaper’s longtime typesetter, Pat Sorrento; and Esther Dyson ’71, then a 17-year-old freshman who ran around helping out however she could.

Four more people. No problem.

My confidence was swiftly punished. Kramer, now a senior fellow at the University of Minnesota’s School of Journalism, had no idea who came up with “Harvard Beats Yale.” Glassman laughed and said, “People over the years have congratulated me on writing the headline, but I’m not sure I did.” He then sent me off on a detour, saying I had to call Bill Bryson ’67 (’69), a news staffer who had given Glassman tickets to The Game (whoops!) and stayed in the Crimson office to handle that Saturday’s postgame extra edition. Six phone calls uncovered Bryson’s whereabouts—but have you ever tried to phone a U.S. circuit court judge?

“I’m sorry, Judge Bryson isn’t available at the moment,” the woman said.

“Uh, do judges have voice mail?”

They don’t, it turns out, but Bryson returned my message within minutes. “I wish I could plead guilty,” he yukked, “but it wasn’t my headline. I would have been much more pleased with myself. I think it wasn’t until the following Monday’s paper that that headline ran.”

Could that be true? Before I could determine the ramifications of this—to that point, everyone had assumed the headline had run in the Saturday extra—Dyson returned my e-mail. (Now an e-publishing force dubbed “Queen of the Digerati” by the New York Times, e-mail is the only way to contact her.) Whichever edition it was, she had no idea who wrote the headline. Neither did Josh Simon ’00, the current Crimson president. But he did clear up one small point: Bryson was right, the Saturday extra ran a different headline, “Harvard, Yale Draw, 29-29.” It was the Monday edition that featured the famous banner. But still, who wrote it? Simon offered two more names from that paper’s masthead: sports editor Richard Paisner ’70, J.D. ’74, and night editor Bill Kutik ’70.

No dice with Paisner, now a health-care technology investor in Washington, D.C. He said to try Jim Lardner ’69, the grandson of Ring, and now a writer himself in New York City. “Far be it for a Paisner to take credit for a great line when a Lardner was part of the team,” he declared. Like everyone else, though, Lardner charmingly declined his chance to seize any credit. “My role,” he said, “was taking pleasure in the whole thing.”

Every person offered two or three others to try, the candidates multiplying like bacteria. I even tracked down Sorrento, the production supervisor who spent 32 years helping the Crimson hum before retiring to Chelsea last year. He remembered Bryson saying, “Run with it!” but added, “I have no idea who wrote the headline. All I did was set it.” Two months into this process, and after sifting through eight more names with no results, I was about to give up. My last call would be made to Kutik, the night editor whom I had forgotten about. I caught him as he was walking out the door and gave my now-memorized spiel about trying to find the author of history’s most underrated headline.

“You got him,” Kutik said. “You got the guy.”

At last! As night editor, Kutik explained, he edited copy and wrote headlines that Sunday afternoon after The Game. He was hunched over a page of scribble, fiddling with “Harvard Yies Yale, 29-29,” horribly dissatisfied because every reader already knew the score. “It didn’t reflect the feel of the game,” Kutik recalled. Then photography editor Tim Carlson ’71 looked over his shoulder.

“How ‘bout ‘HARVARD BEATS YALE, 29-29’?” Carlson asked.

“But…,” Kutik reflexively balked. Then he realized how perfect it was. He convinced skeptical higher-ups to accept the headline, and hours later, it was flying off the Crimson presses.

The problem, I gingerly explained to Kutik, was that I still hadn’t found the person who thought of the headline. Carlson’s was the flash of inspiration; Kutik had only implemented it. Where was Tim Carlson? All Kutik remembered was that he had worked for a Los Angeles newspaper at some point. Seventeen attempts to find him there or through phone, Internet, or Harvard alumni searches didn’t work, until finally an old friend said he had an old e-mail address that surely was out-of-date. Desperate, I pecked out an e-mail to Carlson detailing my quest and begging his reply.

He called me the next day.

“I was taking photographs for the Crimson in the end zone,” said Carlson, now the editor of Inside Triathlon magazine in Boulder, Colorado. “When the game ends, I’m running across the field, people are dancing, and this very drunk undergraduate sees my camera and press pass and says, ‘You know, “Harvard Beats Yale,”’ as if he’d gotten a vision of it. Like he had just seen God.

“I was like, ‘Oh my God, that’s right.’ I was smart enough to know it was good, but I didn’t think of it. The person who had the vision of it was an anonymous undergraduate. It would be nice to say I was smart and take all the credit. I guess you could say I wasn’t dumb enough to drop it. I was present at the conception.”

With that, Carlson and I said our good-byes and hung up. I just started laughing. Three months into this odyssey, there would be no reward. The hunt was over. Rather than finding a fact, I had confirmed a mystery. Maybe that drunken undergraduate will read this story, recall that magical moment of delirium, and identify himself. Or perhaps the afternoon’s alcohol forever erased his memory.

Either way, his headline has become almost as legendary as the remarkable Game that inspired it. And as for my quest, like the tie itself, no answer became the best outcome of all.

Issues > November-December 2000 > John Harvard's Journal

November-December 2000

An Autumn Accent: Gold Leaf

November-December 2000

Rocketing Returns

November-December 2000

Russian Fallout

November-December 2000

Harvard Takes Health On-line

November-December 2000

New Life for Old Instruments

November-December 2000

Bill R. Appleton

November-December 2000

Brevia

November-December 2000

Black and Brown

November-December 2000

The Sorority Scene

November-December 2000

Institution-building at PBHA

November-December 2000

Up in the Air and Killing

November-December 2000

Rose-Colored Passes

November-December 2000

Fall Sports in Brief

Responses to “The Saga of a Great Headline

  1. January 3, 2009

    This IS a great headline and it captures the reality of the situation.

    However to be technically correct, Alan Schwarz is incorrect. He stated that Harvard came from behind, 29-16 with 42 seconds left in the game.

    The clock showed 1:13 minutes when Harvard began their comeback from 29-16. Harvard marched down the field and scored.

    The score was 29-22 at the 42 second mark, 7 points down, not 13.

    This was also the point Yale supporters in the crowd changed their chant from “We’re #1!” to “You’re #2!” accompanied with the Mickey Mouse theme from the band.

    Harvard players agreed this taunting steeled their will!

    I don’t mean to detract from the wonderful headline, just shooting for accuracy.

    ~Marshall P. Smith

  2. April 23, 2009

    Last night I watched Kevin Rafferty’s captivating new film “Harvard Beats Yale 29-29” at the Harris Theater in Pittsburgh.

    To clarify Marshall Smith’s point, Alan Schwarz actually wrote: “Somebody at the Crimson, with only one little word, had brilliantly captured the essence of the Harvard football team’s legendary comeback (16 points in the final 42 seconds) to tie Yale in November 1968.”

    So, the score was 29-13 (not 29-16) when Harvard started its comeback.

    At the 43-second mark, the score was still 29-13.

    At the 42-second mark, the score was 29-21 (after the touchdown and two-point conversion) (not 29-22).

    Technically, then, Harvard came from behind 29-13 with 43 (not 42) seconds left in the game.

    Interesting side point: during Harvard’s on-sides kick at the 42-second mark, no time ran off the clock. Thus, when Harvard regained possession for its final drive, it still had 42 seconds left. An article in the Yale Herald Online (Aaron Lichtig, November 18, 1999) suggested that this was a refereeing mistake.

    Rule 5 of the 2007 NCAA Football Rules and Interpretations, however, reads as follows: “When the ball is free-kicked, the game clock shall be started when the ball is legally touched in the field of play or crosses the goal line after being touched legally by Team B in its end zone…”

    Assuming that the same rule was in force in 1968, then it appears correct that the clock not be started until the ball is legally touched after the on-sides kick. The Harvard player who recovered the kick (by falling on the ball) would have caused the clock to start and stop at the same time, thus leaving all 42 seconds on the clock for Harvard’s final drive.

    ~Vince Lackner

  3. September 12, 2009

    I’ve never understood the headline or how it captures the “essence of the game.” It seems pretty clear to me that Yale BEAT Harvard (if anyone beat anyone), since they were pretty far ahead until the last minute of the game and played better overall.
    Maybe I just don’t understand football …

    ~Andrea

  4. September 27, 2009

    The TD was scored with 42 seconds left and the clock does not run during the 2 point conversion attempt.So the fact is Harvard scored 16 points in the final 42 seconds to beat Yale 29-29 on November 20,1968.

    Alan Schwarz is correct.

    ~Frank

Add a new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <span> <b> <i> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

Copyright ©1996—2009
Harvard Magazine Inc.
Contact the webmaster